trivial: remove one obsolete comment

anyways, we can't send delay_req just after receiving f-up. Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@gnudd.com>

trivial: remove one obsolete comment
anyways, we can't send delay_req just after receiving f-up. Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@gnudd.com>
e8c298ba · Alessandro Rubini · f08c8449 · e8c298ba
Commit e8c298ba authored Jun 04, 2015 by Alessandro Rubini
Hide whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side

Showing with 0 additions and 2 deletions

hooks.c proto-ext-whiterabbit/hooks.c +0 -2

No files found.
--- a/proto-ext-whiterabbit/hooks.c
+++ b/proto-ext-whiterabbit/hooks.c
@@ -189,8 +189,6 @@ static int wr_handle_followup(struct pp_instance *ppi,
 	precise_orig_timestamp->phase = 0;
 	wr_servo_got_sync(ppi, precise_orig_timestamp,
 			  &ppi->t2);
-	/* TODO Check: generates instability (Tx timestamp invalid) */
-	/* return msg_issue_delay_req(ppi); */

 	return 1; /* the caller returns too */
 }