Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Sign in
Toggle navigation
W
White Rabbit
Project
Project
Details
Activity
Cycle Analytics
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Charts
Issues
5
Issues
5
List
Board
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
Wiki
Wiki
image/svg+xml
Discourse
Discourse
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Charts
Create a new issue
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
Projects
White Rabbit
Commits
1ebfc52c
Commit
1ebfc52c
authored
Sep 10, 2014
by
Grzegorz Daniluk
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
presentations/robustness_April_2011: use common
parent
e32e2b18
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
2 changed files
with
65 additions
and
69 deletions
+65
-69
Makefile
presentations/robustness_April_2011/Makefile
+2
-6
robustness.tex
presentations/robustness_April_2011/robustness.tex
+63
-63
No files found.
presentations/robustness_April_2011/Makefile
View file @
1ebfc52c
...
...
@@ -2,16 +2,12 @@ all : robustness.pdf
.PHONY
:
all clean
robustness.pdf
:
robustness.tex
figs
robustness.pdf
:
robustness.tex
latex
$^
latex
$^
dvips robustness
ps2pdf robustness.ps
figs
:
$(MAKE)
-C
fig
clean
:
$(MAKE)
clean
-C
fig
rm
-f
*
.eps
*
.pdf
*
.dat
*
.log
*
.out
*
.aux
*
.dvi
*
.ps
rm
-f
*
.eps
*
.pdf
*
.dat
*
.log
*
.out
*
.aux
*
.dvi
*
.ps
*
.nav
*
.snm
*
.toc
presentations/robustness_April_2011/robustness.tex
View file @
1ebfc52c
...
...
@@ -150,13 +150,13 @@ GW of 100$\mu s$ is very tight and needs solid justification.
\label
{
tab:CMspDelay
}
\end{table}
}
\column
{
3in
}
\includegraphics
[height=5.2cm,keepaspectratio]
{
CMdelayStandard
}
\end{columns}
\column
{
3in
}
\includegraphics
[height=5.2cm,keepaspectratio]
{
../../figures/robustness/CMdelayStandard.ps
}
\end{columns}
\end{frame}
...
...
@@ -180,13 +180,13 @@ GW of 100$\mu s$ is very tight and needs solid justification.
\centering
\textcolor
{
red
}{
DISCUSSION:
}
\\
Drop on collision, sending of HP by more Data Master and/or nodes.
\column
{
2.3in
}
\centering
\includegraphics
[height=4cm,keepaspectratio]
{
SWhpRouting
}
{
\tiny
\begin{table}
[ht]
%\centering
\column
{
2.3in
}
\centering
\includegraphics
[height=4cm,keepaspectratio]
{
../../figures/robustness/SWhpRouting.ps
}
{
\tiny
\begin{table}
[ht]
%\centering
\begin{tabular}
{
| c | c | c | c |
}
\hline
\textbf
{
CM size
}&
\multicolumn
{
2
}{
|c|
}{
\textbf
{
CM Delivery Delay
}}
\\
&
GSI
&
CERN
\\
\hline
...
...
@@ -303,26 +303,26 @@ Triple-redundancy & 495 & 2048
\item
The redundancy of the WRN is justified only if Data Master is
highly reliable or redundant.
\end{itemize}
\column
{
1.2in
}
\centering
\includegraphics
[height=5cm,keepaspectratio]
{
inOutOfWRN
}
\end{columns}
\centering
\column
{
1.2in
}
\centering
\includegraphics
[height=5cm,keepaspectratio]
{
../../figures/robustness/inOutOfWRN.ps
}
\end{columns}
\centering
\textcolor
{
red
}{
DISCUSSION:
}
\\
Redundant connection to WR nodes.
\end{frame}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{frame}
\frametitle
{
Triple-redundancy of topology
}
\centering
\includegraphics
[height=4cm,keepaspectratio]
{
tripleTopology
}
\begin{itemize}
\item
For
$
\approx
$
2000 WR nodes connected to two layers of switches,
\begin{frame}
\frametitle
{
Triple-redundancy of topology
}
\centering
\includegraphics
[height=4cm,keepaspectratio]
{
../../figures/robustness/tripleTopology
}
\begin{itemize}
\item
For
$
\approx
$
2000 WR nodes connected to two layers of switches,
15 switches in L0, 80 in L1 and 400 in L2 are required (total 495)
\end{itemize}
...
...
@@ -348,13 +348,13 @@ Redundant connection to WR nodes.
possible topologies.
\end{itemize}
\column
{
1.2in
}
\centering
\includegraphics
[height=5cm,keepaspectratio]
{
RSTPcomplex
}
\end{columns}
\centering
\column
{
1.2in
}
\centering
\includegraphics
[height=5cm,keepaspectratio]
{
../../figures/robustness/RSTPcomplex.ps
}
\end{columns}
\centering
\textcolor
{
red
}{
DISCUSSION:
}
\\
Ring topology - impossible with current approach, is it worth considering, what
is the feasibility of ring WRN?
...
...
@@ -365,22 +365,22 @@ is the feasibility of ring WRN?
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{frame}
\frametitle
{
WR RSTP -- theoretical consideration
}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\centering
\includegraphics
[height=5cm,keepaspectratio]
{
RSTPsimple
}
\end{frame}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\centering
\includegraphics
[height=5cm,keepaspectratio]
{
../../figures/robustness/RSTPsimple.ps
}
\end{frame}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{frame}
\frametitle
{
WR RSTP -- real-life consideration
}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\centering
\includegraphics
[height=5cm,keepaspectratio]
{
RSTPcomplex2
}
\begin{itemize}
\item
Introducing maximum cut-through delay (13
$
us
$
) on backup ports of the
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\centering
\includegraphics
[height=5cm,keepaspectratio]
{
../../figures/robustness/RSTPcomplex2.ps
}
\begin{itemize}
\item
Introducing maximum cut-through delay (13
$
us
$
) on backup ports of the
switch.
\item
Backup link always 1 hoop longer then active.
\end{itemize}
...
...
@@ -416,13 +416,13 @@ How do we indicate that FEC is to be used? EtherType? WB special reg?
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{frame}
\frametitle
{
Flow and Congestion Control
}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\centering
\includegraphics
[height=7cm,keepaspectratio]
{
FECflow
}
\end{frame}
\frametitle
{
Flow and Congestion Control
}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\centering
\includegraphics
[height=7cm,keepaspectratio]
{
../../figures/robustness/FECflow.ps
}
\end{frame}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{frame}
...
...
@@ -447,13 +447,13 @@ Cesar's playground...
\item
Detection of lost HP Frames (in WR Switches) using FEC ID and CM ID
(stored in the header added by FEC).
\item
Precise knowledge of HP traffic delays on the path DataMaster
$
<
-
>
$
Node.
\item
Monitoring of WRPTP parameters.
\end{itemize}
\centering
\includegraphics
[height=4cm,keepaspectratio]
{
delayMonitoring
}
\end{frame}
\item
Monitoring of WRPTP parameters.
\end{itemize}
\centering
\includegraphics
[height=4cm,keepaspectratio]
{
../../figures/robustness/delayMonitoring.ps
}
\end{frame}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section
{
DISCUSSION (OHMG)
}
\subsection
{
Oh, My God !!!
}
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment