Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Sign in
Toggle navigation
W
White Rabbit
Project
Project
Details
Activity
Cycle Analytics
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Charts
Issues
5
Issues
5
List
Board
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
Wiki
Wiki
image/svg+xml
Discourse
Discourse
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Charts
Create a new issue
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
Projects
White Rabbit
Commits
e32e2b18
Commit
e32e2b18
authored
Sep 10, 2014
by
Grzegorz Daniluk
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
presentations/robustness: use common figures
parent
6b5dbc8a
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
21 additions
and
21 deletions
+21
-21
robustness.tex
presentations/robustness/robustness.tex
+21
-21
No files found.
presentations/robustness/robustness.tex
View file @
e32e2b18
...
...
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
\begin{figure}
[tbp]
% float placement: (h)ere, page (t)op, page (b)ottom, other (p)age
\centering
% file name: E:/Moje Dokumenty/PW/doktorat/PhD_project/whireRabbit/repo/trunk/documentation/presentations/robustness/hierarchy.pdf
\includegraphics
[height=2.65in,keepaspectratio]
{
hierarchy
}
\includegraphics
[height=2.65in,keepaspectratio]
{
../../figures/network/hierarchy.pdf
}
%\caption{Overview of White Rabbit Network}
\label
{
fig:hierarchy
}
\end{figure}
...
...
@@ -49,11 +49,11 @@
\begin{frame}
\frametitle
{
Clock Recovery...holdover
}
% Insert frame title between curly braces
\begin{figure}
[tbp]
% float placement: (h)ere, page (t)op, page (b)ottom, other (p)age
\centering
\centering
\includegraphics
[height=6cm,keepaspectratio]
{
layer1redudnancy2
}
\includegraphics
[height=6cm,keepaspectratio]
{
../../figures/robustness/layer1redundancy2.png
}
% \includegraphics[height=6cm,keepaspectratio]{clockHoldover}
% \includegraphics[height=6cm,keepaspectratio]{clockHoldover}
\end{figure}
...
...
@@ -91,10 +91,10 @@
\begin{figure}
[tbp]
% float placement: (h)ere, page (t)op, page (b)ottom, other (p)age
\centering
\includegraphics
[width=9cm,keepaspectratio]
{
network
_
topology
_
0
}
\includegraphics
[width=9cm,keepaspectratio]
{
../../figures/network/network
_
topology
_
0.png
}
\end{figure}
$
P
=
0
.
012
\%
$
\hspace
{
4cm
}
$
P
=
0
.
00000087
\%
$
\\
$
MTBF
=
16700
[
h
]
$
\hspace
{
2cm
}
$
MTBF
=
1370000000
[
h
]
$
...
...
@@ -108,10 +108,10 @@ $MTBF=16700[h]$ \hspace{2cm} $MTBF=1370000000[h]$
\begin{figure}
[tbp]
% float placement: (h)ere, page (t)op, page (b)ottom, other (p)age
\centering
\includegraphics
[width=9cm,keepaspectratio]
{
network
_
topology
}
\includegraphics
[width=9cm,keepaspectratio]
{
../../figures/network/network
_
topology.png
}
\end{figure}
\hspace
{
4cm
}$
P
=
0
.
00000154
\%
$
\\
\hspace
{
4cm
}$
P
=
0
.
00000154
\%
$
\\
\hspace
{
4cm
}$
MTBF
=
780000000
[
h
]
$
\end{frame}
...
...
@@ -151,13 +151,13 @@ Which Spanning Tree should I use? $\rightarrow$ It depends on the use case.
CERN:
$
\sim
$
40km; t
$_{
HP
}$
$
\approx
$
256
$
\mu
$
s [GW: 1000
$
\mu
$
s]
GSI :
$
\sim
$
4 km; t
$_{
HP
}$
$
\approx
$
89
$
\mu
$
s [GW: 100
$
\mu
$
s]
\column
{
3in
}
\includegraphics
[height=6.2cm,keepaspectratio]
{
granuality
_
window
}
\end{columns}
\end{frame}
\column
{
3in
}
\includegraphics
[height=6.2cm,keepaspectratio]
{
../../figures/robustness/
granuality
_
window
}
\end{columns}
\end{frame}
\section
{
Robustness Upper Layer
}
...
...
@@ -203,10 +203,10 @@ Flow Control and Congestion Control
\begin{columns}
\begin{column}
[c]
{
5cm
}
% slides are 3in high by 5in wide
% \includegraphics[height=6.2cm,keepaspectratio]{broadcast_ber.jpg}
% \includegraphics[height=6.2cm,keepaspectratio]{broadcast_ber.jpg}
% file name: E:/Moje Dokumenty/PW/doktorat/PhD_project/whireRabbit/repo/trunk/documentation/presentations/robustness/broadcast_ber.jpg
\includegraphics
[width=6cm,keepaspectratio]
{
broadcast
_
ber
}
\includegraphics
[width=6cm,keepaspectratio]
{
../../figures/robustness/broadcast
_
ber.jpg
}
\end{column}
...
...
@@ -252,8 +252,8 @@ Packet Error Rate throughout one year \footnote{Granularity Window $100\mu$} $\
Always it is better a packet with an errors than no packet, isn't it?, Thus in WR network a packet will be dropped:
\begin{center}
%\includegraphics[scale=0.30]{dropped_packet.jpg}
\includegraphics
[scale=0.30]
{
dropped
_
packet
}
%\includegraphics[scale=0.30]{dropped_packet.jpg}
\includegraphics
[scale=0.30]
{
../../figures/robustness/
dropped
_
packet
}
\end{center}
...
...
@@ -300,9 +300,9 @@ Erasure Code 1/3 rate and 1 bit correction achieve $\approx 10^{-13}$
\frametitle
{
FEC Scheme
}
Repetition Code Vs WR FEC Scheme
\begin{center}
% \includegraphics[scale=0.35]{biterror.jpg}
% \includegraphics[scale=0.35]{biterror.jpg}
\includegraphics
[scale=0.35]
{
biterror
}
\includegraphics
[scale=0.35]
{
../../figures/robustness/
biterror
}
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment