Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Sign in
Toggle navigation
W
White Rabbit Calibration
Project
Project
Details
Activity
Cycle Analytics
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Charts
Issues
1
Issues
1
List
Board
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
Wiki
Wiki
image/svg+xml
Discourse
Discourse
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Charts
Create a new issue
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
Projects
White Rabbit Calibration
Commits
9d77bd0d
Commit
9d77bd0d
authored
Apr 12, 2019
by
Peter Jansweijer
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
Keep track of readme.txt which contains a list of data used for the article.
parent
f748525a
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
67 additions
and
0 deletions
+67
-0
ReadMe.txt
sw/insitu_alpha/ReadMe.txt
+67
-0
No files found.
sw/insitu_alpha/ReadMe.txt
0 → 100644
View file @
9d77bd0d
=======================================================================================
This file is a guide and index to the measurement data that are used in the article
"In-situ determination of the fiber Delay Coefficient in time-dissemination networks"
=======================================================================================
Select:
50 km fiber wr_serial.py => data_180621_snd (57 measurements, 0.0967317 degrees MaxTempVariation.xlsx)
Reference setup: wr_serial.py => data_180625 (31 measurements, 0.0515712 degrees MaxTempVariation.xlsx)
analyze_sellmeier.py data_180621_snd -r data_180625 => data_180621_snd/averaged_ddelay.out
Raw data from data_180621_snd copied into data_180914 (= same data set!)
Article:
Note that results slightly (a ~10e-21 effect) differ depending on using python analyze scripts under Windows or under Ubuntu!
In the article the Ubuntu results were used.
### OLD ###fig 3: data_180621_snd/averaged.png
### OLD ###fig 4: data_180621_snd/averaged_alpha.png
### OLD ###Table II: data_180621_snd/averaged_err.out
fig 3: data_180914/averaged.png
fig 4: data_180914/averaged_alpha.png
Table II: data_180914/averaged_err.out
data source: ./analyze_sellmeier.py data_180914 -r data_180625 => data_180914/averaged_ddelay.out
### OLD ###Table III: data_180621_snd/result.txt Mean: 932.89774905, StDev: 3.90038933386, StErr: 0.516619187785 however, these are
### OLD ### pure 50 KM wavelength scan measurements while data_180621_snd/averaged.png shows the 1st order fit for these
### OLD ### scans but compensated for the reference setup (directory: data_180625).
Table III, IV:
alpha_sel(l1), alpha_stddev_sel(l1), alpha_3wl(l1), alpha_3wl_stddev(l1), time_err (i.e the calculated time error)
3wl based on section~\ref{sec:Comparing_Sellmeier_and_three_lambda}
data source: p:\App\ASTERICS_Cleopatra_WP5_1\WR_Calibration\wr-calibration\sw\insitu_alpha\data_180914\averaged_err.out
time_meas_3wl, time_meas_3wl_stddev (i.e. PPS diff results)
data source ./calc_diff.py data_180926/181030_15_19_37_DeltaDelay_meas data_180926/181031_09_12_18_DeltaDelay_meas -t 400 -o data_180914_pps
data_180914_pps/190409_11_25_10_DeltaDelayDifference
Table V, VI:
alpha_sel(l1), alpha_stddev_sel(l1)
data source: p:\App\ASTERICS_Cleopatra_WP5_1\WR_Calibration\wr-calibration\sw\insitu_alpha\data_180914\averaged_err.out
alpha_3wl(l1), alpha_3wl_stddev(l1)
3wl based on section~\ref{sec:determination_using_three_lambda}
data source: data_180926/180926_15_47_01_3_lambda_insitu_alpha_scan_result.txt
calculated time_error
data source: .\ArticleErrorbarPlots\errorbarplots.py
=> time_error_result.txt
time_meas_3wl, time_meas_3wl_stddev (i.e. PPS diff results)
data source ./calc_diff.py data_180926/181030_15_19_37_DeltaDelay_meas data_180926/181031_09_12_18_DeltaDelay_meas -t 400 -o data_180914_pps
=> data_180914_pps/190409_11_25_10_DeltaDelayDifference
fig 5:
data source: .\ArticleErrorbarPlots\errorbarplots.py
=> time_error_small_wavelenfgth_offset.png
fig 6:
data source: .\ArticleErrorbarPlots\errorbarplots.py
=> time_error_full_cband.png
Based on Alphas: data_180621_snd/averaged_ddelay.out
Combine 50 km fiber data_180627 -r 20 and data_180629 -r 80 into data_180629_combined (100 measurements)
Combine Reference setup data_180626 -r 20 and data_180703 -r 80 into data_180703_combined (100 measurements)
Calc_diff output PPS diff results in Excell:
### OLD ###data_180703_combined/180709_12_17_22_DeltaDelayDifference.xlsx
data_180914_pps\190409_10_07_48_DeltaDelayDifference
Fiber spool CRTT temperature dependency: data_180925/180925_09_49_05_180926_09_22_12_crtt_vs_temp.xlsx
\ No newline at end of file
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment