Commit 1ebfc52c authored by Grzegorz Daniluk's avatar Grzegorz Daniluk

presentations/robustness_April_2011: use common

parent e32e2b18
......@@ -2,16 +2,12 @@ all : robustness.pdf
.PHONY : all clean
robustness.pdf : robustness.tex figs
robustness.pdf : robustness.tex
latex $^
latex $^
dvips robustness
ps2pdf robustness.ps
figs:
$(MAKE) -C fig
clean :
$(MAKE) clean -C fig
rm -f *.eps *.pdf *.dat *.log *.out *.aux *.dvi *.ps
rm -f *.eps *.pdf *.dat *.log *.out *.aux *.dvi *.ps *.nav *.snm *.toc
......@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ GW of 100$\mu s$ is very tight and needs solid justification.
\column{3in}
\includegraphics[height=5.2cm,keepaspectratio]{CMdelayStandard}
\includegraphics[height=5.2cm,keepaspectratio]{../../figures/robustness/CMdelayStandard.ps}
\end{columns}
......@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ Drop on collision, sending of HP by more Data Master and/or nodes.
\column{2.3in}
\centering
\includegraphics[height=4cm,keepaspectratio]{SWhpRouting}
\includegraphics[height=4cm,keepaspectratio]{../../figures/robustness/SWhpRouting.ps}
{\tiny
\begin{table}[ht]
%\centering
......@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ Triple-redundancy & 495 & 2048
\column{1.2in}
\centering
\includegraphics[height=5cm,keepaspectratio]{inOutOfWRN}
\includegraphics[height=5cm,keepaspectratio]{../../figures/robustness/inOutOfWRN.ps}
\end{columns}
\centering
......@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ Redundant connection to WR nodes.
\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Triple-redundancy of topology}
\centering
\includegraphics[height=4cm,keepaspectratio]{tripleTopology}
\includegraphics[height=4cm,keepaspectratio]{../../figures/robustness/tripleTopology}
\begin{itemize}
\item For $\approx$2000 WR nodes connected to two layers of switches,
......@@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ Redundant connection to WR nodes.
\column{1.2in}
\centering
\includegraphics[height=5cm,keepaspectratio]{RSTPcomplex}
\includegraphics[height=5cm,keepaspectratio]{../../figures/robustness/RSTPcomplex.ps}
\end{columns}
\centering
......@@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ is the feasibility of ring WRN?
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\centering
\includegraphics[height=5cm,keepaspectratio]{RSTPsimple}
\includegraphics[height=5cm,keepaspectratio]{../../figures/robustness/RSTPsimple.ps}
\end{frame}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
......@@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ is the feasibility of ring WRN?
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\centering
\includegraphics[height=5cm,keepaspectratio]{RSTPcomplex2}
\includegraphics[height=5cm,keepaspectratio]{../../figures/robustness/RSTPcomplex2.ps}
\begin{itemize}
\item Introducing maximum cut-through delay (13$us$) on backup ports of the
......@@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ How do we indicate that FEC is to be used? EtherType? WB special reg?
\frametitle{Flow and Congestion Control }
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\centering
\includegraphics[height=7cm,keepaspectratio]{FECflow}
\includegraphics[height=7cm,keepaspectratio]{../../figures/robustness/FECflow.ps}
\end{frame}
......@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ Cesar's playground...
\item Monitoring of WRPTP parameters.
\end{itemize}
\centering
\includegraphics[height=4cm,keepaspectratio]{delayMonitoring}
\includegraphics[height=4cm,keepaspectratio]{../../figures/robustness/delayMonitoring.ps}
\end{frame}
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment